报告围绕你手上这个机会生成，回答的问题只有一个：接下来该找谁，怎么找。The report is built around the opportunity on your desk, and it answers one question: who to go after next, and how.
权力地图 · 示意Power map · illustrative
每个结论都标置信度，附信息来源。Every conclusion carries a confidence level and its sources.
判断：VP Finance 是这单能签字的人（置信度 中高）。支持证据：本季采购冻结由财务线签发；IT 负责人在访谈里两次提到「预算要过财务」。反证：该公司历史上技术采购由 CTO 拍板。下一步验证：首次会议直接问「这类预算今年走哪条审批线」。Call: the VP of Finance is the one who signs this deal (confidence: medium-high). Supporting evidence: this quarter's purchasing freeze was issued by the finance org; the head of IT said twice in interviews that budget goes through finance. Against: technology purchases here have historically been signed off by the CTO. Next step: in your first meeting, ask which approval line this budget runs through this year.
公开信息不是全知的。报告只写有依据的判断；填不上的地方明确标成缺口，并附上下一步怎么验证。我们认为这比一份看起来全知的报告值钱。Public information isn't omniscient. The report only states what the evidence supports; where it can't fill something in, it marks the gap openly and tells you how to verify it next. We think that's worth more than a report that pretends to know everything.
内测免费 · 每周名额有限Free during beta · limited slots each week